Besides nerves, the foreskin acts as an erogenous sheath in which the shaft and glans glide and with which the frenulum and ridged band are stimulated.

The foreskin provides not just more sensitivity, but *enhanced* sensitivity.

These structures and nerves are essential to the complete experience and functioning of the sex act, so that their amputation results in a clear sensory and mechanical deficiency.

There is no debate that circumcision destroys sexual ‘perception’. The only question is whether the REMAINING tissue (glans and what’s left of the inner foreskin) is desensitized due to the conditions engendered by the amputation of the foreskin. While there is conflicting evidence as to the degree of further desensitizing, it is certainly the case that the glans and remaining inner foreskin are transformed into fully external structures—something that is unnatural for these mucosal tissues. They suffer from drying-out, subtle lifelong abrasion (simple contact with clothes), and keratinization (a response that reduces the irritation of drying-out and abrasion, but also results in a reduction of nerve stimulation; intact men, who find themselves to be too sensitive are often instructed to retract their foreskins for intervals of time in order to dull their senses).

To forcibly circumcise a defenseless baby boy is to slight his human rights, dignity, respect, and personal liberty.

love the episode, I watched several times and couldnt stop laughing.
Keep up the great work.

By the way, is it wrong to have a strong attraction towards larissa?